Covina, CA public schools
17 public schools. Tick schools to compare their trends.
2025-26 results
Subject percentages show the share of students who met or exceeded the state standard.
| Pick to compare | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Badillo Elementary
Grades K–6
· Charter Oak Unified
|
37%
−4
vs state
|
45%
−2
vs state
|
72% | |
|
Barranca Elementary
Grades K–5
· Covina-Valley Unified
|
57%
+15
vs state
|
60%
+14
vs state
|
75% | |
|
Ben Lomond Elementary
Grades K–5
· Covina-Valley Unified
|
37%
−6
vs state
|
40%
−6
vs state
|
75% | |
|
Cedargrove Elementary
Grades K–6
· Charter Oak Unified
|
36%
−4
vs state
|
42%
−5
vs state
|
77% | |
|
Charter Oak High
Grades 9–12
· Charter Oak Unified
|
28%
−4
vs state
|
56%
−2
vs state
|
69% | |
|
Covina High
Grades 9–12
· Covina-Valley Unified
|
33%
+1
vs state
|
63%
+5
vs state
|
72% | |
|
Covina-Valley Learning Options Academy
Grades K–12
Alternative
· Covina-Valley Unified
|
35%
±0
vs state
|
35%
−17
vs state
|
91% | |
|
Cypress Elementary
Grades K–5
· Covina-Valley Unified
|
41%
±0
vs state
|
43%
−4
vs state
|
79% | |
|
Fairvalley High (Continuation)
Grades 9–12
Alternative
· Covina-Valley Unified
|
0%
−32
vs state
|
3%
−55
vs state
|
87% | |
|
Gladstone Middle
Grades 6–8
· Azusa Unified
|
20%
−17
vs state
|
31%
−18
vs state
|
90% | |
|
Glen Oak Elementary
Grades K–6
· Charter Oak Unified
|
42%
+1
vs state
|
51%
+4
vs state
|
75% | |
|
Las Palmas Middle
Grades 6–8
· Covina-Valley Unified
|
40%
+3
vs state
|
55%
+6
vs state
|
79% | |
|
Manzanita Elementary
Grades K–5
· Covina-Valley Unified
|
65%
+23
vs state
|
57%
+10
vs state
|
63% | |
|
Merwin Elementary
Grades K–5
· Covina-Valley Unified
|
42%
±0
vs state
|
48%
+1
vs state
|
84% | |
|
Northview High
Grades 9–12
· Covina-Valley Unified
|
18%
−14
vs state
|
45%
−12
vs state
|
79% | |
|
Royal Oak Middle
Grades 7–8
· Charter Oak Unified
|
47%
+10
vs state
|
58%
+8
vs state
|
74% | |
|
Sierra Vista Middle
Grades 6–8
· Covina-Valley Unified
|
50%
+13
vs state
|
56%
+7
vs state
|
68% |
No schools match this filter.
Overall change: average of the three subjects, latest year vs. 3 years earlier (↑4% means the average rate went up 4 points, e.g. 82% → 86%; — means within ±2%). Low income = eligible for free or reduced-price lunch.