New York City Geographic District #29
46 public schools · Springfield Gardens, NY
2024-25 results
Subject percentages show the share of students who met or exceeded the state standard.
| Pick to compare | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Bellaire School (the)
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
53%
−4
vs state
|
55%
−1
vs state
|
76% | |
|
Benjamin Franklin Hs-Fin Info Tech
Grades 9–12
Career & technical
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
77%
+21
vs state
|
80%
+5
vs state
|
85% | |
|
Cambria Heights Academy
Grades 9–12
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
25%
−31
vs state
|
65%
−10
vs state
|
80% | |
|
Collaborative Arts Middle School
Grades 6–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
30%
−21
vs state
|
49%
−3
vs state
|
88% | |
|
Community Voices Middle School
Grades 6–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
31%
−21
vs state
|
46%
−5
vs state
|
86% | |
|
Cynthia Jenkins School
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
48%
−9
vs state
|
54%
−1
vs state
|
80% | |
|
Eagle Academy for Young Men III
Grades 6–12
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
64%
+10
vs state
|
45%
−7
vs state
|
75% | |
|
Excelsior Preparatory High School
Grades 9–12
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
66%
+10
vs state
|
67%
−9
vs state
|
83% | |
|
George Washington Carver High School for the Sciences
Grades 9–12
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
26%
−30
vs state
|
63%
−13
vs state
|
77% | |
|
Gordon Parks School (the)
Grades PK–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
51%
−2
vs state
|
55%
+2
vs state
|
79% | |
|
Health Arts Robotics and Technology High School
Grades 9–12
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
65%
+9
vs state
|
76%
+1
vs state
|
86% | |
|
Institute for Health Professions at Cambria Heights
Grades 9–12
Career & technical
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
— |
58%
−17
vs state
|
82% | |
|
IS 192 Linden (the)
Grades 6–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
31%
−20
vs state
|
40%
−11
vs state
|
84% | |
|
IS 238 Susan B Anthony Academy
Grades 6–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
43%
−8
vs state
|
46%
−5
vs state
|
85% | |
|
IS 59 Springfield Gardens
Grades 6–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
40%
−12
vs state
|
49%
−2
vs state
|
72% | |
|
Jean Nuzzi Intermediate School
Grades 6–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
51%
−1
vs state
|
50%
−2
vs state
|
78% | |
|
Math/science Research/tech Magnet
Grades 9–12
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
41%
−15
vs state
|
73%
−2
vs state
|
82% | |
|
Pathways College Preparatory School: A College Board School
Grades 6–12
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
69%
+17
vs state
|
72%
+21
vs state
|
72% | |
|
Preparatory Academy for Writers: A College Board School
Grades 6–12
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
67%
+13
vs state
|
46%
−5
vs state
|
69% | |
|
PS 118 Lorraine Hansberry
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
63%
+6
vs state
|
57%
+2
vs state
|
78% | |
|
PS 131 Abigail Adams
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
78%
+21
vs state
|
65%
+10
vs state
|
88% | |
|
PS 132 Ralph Bunche
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
79%
+21
vs state
|
63%
+8
vs state
|
71% | |
|
PS 134 Hollis
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
46%
−11
vs state
|
53%
−2
vs state
|
86% | |
|
PS 136 Roy Wilkins
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
55%
−3
vs state
|
55%
±0
vs state
|
94% | |
|
PS 15 Jackie Robinson
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
44%
−13
vs state
|
49%
−6
vs state
|
79% | |
|
PS 156 Laurelton
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
46%
−11
vs state
|
63%
+8
vs state
|
84% | |
|
PS 176 Cambria Heights
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
82%
+24
vs state
|
79%
+24
vs state
|
76% | |
|
PS 181 Brookfield
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
77%
+19
vs state
|
78%
+23
vs state
|
89% | |
|
PS 195 William Haberle
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
45%
−12
vs state
|
43%
−12
vs state
|
74% | |
|
PS 251
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
66%
+9
vs state
|
69%
+14
vs state
|
76% | |
|
PS 33 Edward M Funk
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
62%
+5
vs state
|
59%
+4
vs state
|
71% | |
|
PS 34 John Harvard
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
58%
+1
vs state
|
58%
+3
vs state
|
84% | |
|
PS 35 Nathaniel Woodhull
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
68%
+11
vs state
|
57%
+3
vs state
|
82% | |
|
PS 36 Saint Albans School
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
49%
−9
vs state
|
49%
−6
vs state
|
86% | |
|
PS 360
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
73%
+16
vs state
|
77%
+22
vs state
|
58% | |
|
PS 38 Rosedale
Grades K–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
65%
+8
vs state
|
71%
+17
vs state
|
66% | |
|
PS 52
Grades PK–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
24%
−33
vs state
|
40%
−15
vs state
|
94% | |
|
PS 95 Eastwood
Grades K–5
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
78%
+20
vs state
|
68%
+14
vs state
|
81% | |
|
Ps/is 116 William C Hughley
Grades PK–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
36%
−19
vs state
|
41%
−12
vs state
|
83% | |
|
Ps/is 208
Grades K–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
57%
+3
vs state
|
60%
+7
vs state
|
63% | |
|
Ps/is 268
Grades K–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
44%
−11
vs state
|
49%
−5
vs state
|
83% | |
|
Ps/is 295
Grades PK–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
74%
+18
vs state
|
70%
+17
vs state
|
75% | |
|
Ps/ms 138 Sunrise
Grades PK–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
40%
−13
vs state
|
45%
−8
vs state
|
79% | |
|
Ps/ms 147 Ronald McNair
Grades PK–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
24%
−30
vs state
|
38%
−15
vs state
|
74% | |
|
Queens Preparatory Academy
Grades 9–12
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
21%
−35
vs state
|
63%
−12
vs state
|
83% | |
|
Queens United Middle School
Grades 6–8
· New York City Geographic District #29
|
36%
−16
vs state
|
47%
−5
vs state
|
76% |
No schools match this filter.
Overall change: average of the three subjects, latest year vs. 3 years earlier (↑4% means the average rate went up 4 points, e.g. 82% → 86%; — means within ±2%). Low income = eligible for free or reduced-price lunch.